@@Gunnar Bittersmann > ♫ *jQuery spills the [:radio star](https://api.jquery.com/radio-selector/)*{:@en} ♫ Da hab ich hach einem Reim auf *kills*{:@en} gesucht … Steht doch da, dass man `:radio`{:.bad} **nicht verwenden** sollte: Because `:radio`{:.bad} is a jQuery extension and not part of the CSS specification, queries using `:radio`{:.bad} cannot take advantage of the performance boost provided by the native DOM `querySelectorAll()` method. For better performance in modern browsers, use `[type="radio"]`{:.good} instead. {:@en} Also doch: ♫ *jQuery **kills** the :radio star*{:@en} ♫ LLAP 🖖 -- “When UX doesn’t consider *all* users, shouldn’t it be known as ‘*Some* User Experience’ or... SUX? #a11y” —[Billy Gregory](https://twitter.com/thebillygregory/status/552466012713783297)

@@Gunnar Bittersmann > ♫ *jQuery spills the [:radio star](https://api.jquery.com/radio-selector/)*{:@en} ♫ Da hab ich hach einem Reim auf *kills*{:@en} gesucht … Steht doch da, dass man `:radio`{:.bad} **nicht verwenden** sollte: Because `:radio`{:.bad} is a jQuery extension and not part of the CSS specification, queries using `:radio`{:.bad} cannot take advantage of the performance boost provided by the native DOM `querySelectorAll()` method. For better performance in modern browsers, use `[type="radio"]`{:.good} instead. Also doch: ♫ *jQuery **kills** the :radio star*{:@en} ♫ LLAP 🖖 -- “When UX doesn’t consider *all* users, shouldn’t it be known as ‘*Some* User Experience’ or... SUX? #a11y” —[Billy Gregory](https://twitter.com/thebillygregory/status/552466012713783297)